Passed queue_depth: 512 exceeds TCM/SE_Device MAX TCQ: 256
wailer
75 Posts
February 27, 2019, 1:03 pmQuote from wailer on February 27, 2019, 1:03 pmI am seeing this message in all nodes of my cluster , only one time as of now.
I have been reading it might be caused by the queue length from controller or disk , but quite lost on this.
Is it something I should worry about ? Any idea how to solve it?
I am seeing this message in all nodes of my cluster , only one time as of now.
I have been reading it might be caused by the queue length from controller or disk , but quite lost on this.
Is it something I should worry about ? Any idea how to solve it?
admin
2,930 Posts
February 27, 2019, 1:44 pmQuote from admin on February 27, 2019, 1:44 pmlook in the config file:
/opt/petasan/config/tuning/current/lio_tunings
if under "storage_objects": it shows
"queue_depth": 512
change it to
"queue_depth": 256
you should move the paths to other nodes then back, this will create a new connection with updated queue depth
look in the config file:
/opt/petasan/config/tuning/current/lio_tunings
if under "storage_objects": it shows
"queue_depth": 512
change it to
"queue_depth": 256
you should move the paths to other nodes then back, this will create a new connection with updated queue depth
wailer
75 Posts
February 27, 2019, 5:21 pmQuote from wailer on February 27, 2019, 5:21 pmHi , I tried this , but path reassignment is always failing.
Thanks,
Hi , I tried this , but path reassignment is always failing.
Thanks,
admin
2,930 Posts
February 27, 2019, 6:42 pmQuote from admin on February 27, 2019, 6:42 pmAfter changing the lio tunings, can you reboot
After changing the lio tunings, can you reboot
wailer
75 Posts
February 27, 2019, 10:45 pmQuote from wailer on February 27, 2019, 10:45 pmSure, then I should restart all nodes one by one to apply this settings.
About the path re-assignment, any idea why is not working ?
Sure, then I should restart all nodes one by one to apply this settings.
About the path re-assignment, any idea why is not working ?
admin
2,930 Posts
February 28, 2019, 6:39 amQuote from admin on February 28, 2019, 6:39 ami suspect it is related to the same thing, let me know if the issue persists.
i suspect it is related to the same thing, let me know if the issue persists.
wailer
75 Posts
February 28, 2019, 10:06 amQuote from wailer on February 28, 2019, 10:06 amJust applied all tuning settings to all nodes, the error message about queue_depth disappeared. I am opening a new post about path the reassignment issue as this one got solved.
Thx!
Just applied all tuning settings to all nodes, the error message about queue_depth disappeared. I am opening a new post about path the reassignment issue as this one got solved.
Thx!
Passed queue_depth: 512 exceeds TCM/SE_Device MAX TCQ: 256
wailer
75 Posts
Quote from wailer on February 27, 2019, 1:03 pmI am seeing this message in all nodes of my cluster , only one time as of now.
I have been reading it might be caused by the queue length from controller or disk , but quite lost on this.
Is it something I should worry about ? Any idea how to solve it?
I am seeing this message in all nodes of my cluster , only one time as of now.
I have been reading it might be caused by the queue length from controller or disk , but quite lost on this.
Is it something I should worry about ? Any idea how to solve it?
admin
2,930 Posts
Quote from admin on February 27, 2019, 1:44 pmlook in the config file:
/opt/petasan/config/tuning/current/lio_tunings
if under "storage_objects": it shows
"queue_depth": 512
change it to
"queue_depth": 256you should move the paths to other nodes then back, this will create a new connection with updated queue depth
look in the config file:
/opt/petasan/config/tuning/current/lio_tunings
if under "storage_objects": it shows
"queue_depth": 512
change it to
"queue_depth": 256
you should move the paths to other nodes then back, this will create a new connection with updated queue depth
wailer
75 Posts
Quote from wailer on February 27, 2019, 5:21 pmHi , I tried this , but path reassignment is always failing.
Thanks,
Hi , I tried this , but path reassignment is always failing.
Thanks,
admin
2,930 Posts
Quote from admin on February 27, 2019, 6:42 pmAfter changing the lio tunings, can you reboot
After changing the lio tunings, can you reboot
wailer
75 Posts
Quote from wailer on February 27, 2019, 10:45 pmSure, then I should restart all nodes one by one to apply this settings.
About the path re-assignment, any idea why is not working ?
Sure, then I should restart all nodes one by one to apply this settings.
About the path re-assignment, any idea why is not working ?
admin
2,930 Posts
Quote from admin on February 28, 2019, 6:39 ami suspect it is related to the same thing, let me know if the issue persists.
i suspect it is related to the same thing, let me know if the issue persists.
wailer
75 Posts
Quote from wailer on February 28, 2019, 10:06 amJust applied all tuning settings to all nodes, the error message about queue_depth disappeared. I am opening a new post about path the reassignment issue as this one got solved.
Thx!
Just applied all tuning settings to all nodes, the error message about queue_depth disappeared. I am opening a new post about path the reassignment issue as this one got solved.
Thx!