1 pools have many more objects per pg than average
Abhishek Kumar Singh
18 Posts
December 21, 2020, 7:10 amQuote from Abhishek Kumar Singh on December 21, 2020, 7:10 amDear Team,
From today we are getting this health warnings for my ceph cluster. I can't delete any pools.
Thanks in advance
Abhishek
Dear Team,
From today we are getting this health warnings for my ceph cluster. I can't delete any pools.
Thanks in advance
Abhishek
admin
2,930 Posts
December 21, 2020, 8:59 amQuote from admin on December 21, 2020, 8:59 amit means 1 pool has many objects but similar pg count than pools with lower object count.
you could suppress ths with setting
mon_pg_warn_max_object_skew to 0
put in in the Ceph Configuration ui under global section
the other option is to re-adjust the pg count but this will cause a lot of rebalance traffic and not recommended.
it means 1 pool has many objects but similar pg count than pools with lower object count.
you could suppress ths with setting
mon_pg_warn_max_object_skew to 0
put in in the Ceph Configuration ui under global section
the other option is to re-adjust the pg count but this will cause a lot of rebalance traffic and not recommended.
Abhishek Kumar Singh
18 Posts
December 24, 2020, 10:17 amQuote from Abhishek Kumar Singh on December 24, 2020, 10:17 amHi Team,
We have 3 node working cluster. we are thinking to add one more server but we are stuck at node interfaces.
Current Cluster network setting,
bond0: eth0(1G),eth1(1G)[Management]
bond1: eth5(10G),eth6(10G)[Backend]
bond2: eth2(10G),eth7(10G) [iSCSI].
But In our new server eth2 is 1G port. How can we rectify this issue.
Hope you understand my query.
Thanks in advance,
Abhishek
Hi Team,
We have 3 node working cluster. we are thinking to add one more server but we are stuck at node interfaces.
Current Cluster network setting,
bond0: eth0(1G),eth1(1G)[Management]
bond1: eth5(10G),eth6(10G)[Backend]
bond2: eth2(10G),eth7(10G) [iSCSI].
But In our new server eth2 is 1G port. How can we rectify this issue.
Hope you understand my query.
Thanks in advance,
Abhishek
admin
2,930 Posts
December 24, 2020, 12:13 pmQuote from admin on December 24, 2020, 12:13 pmYou can rename or re-order interface names from the blue screen menu on the node itself.
You can rename or re-order interface names from the blue screen menu on the node itself.
1 pools have many more objects per pg than average
Abhishek Kumar Singh
18 Posts
Quote from Abhishek Kumar Singh on December 21, 2020, 7:10 amDear Team,
From today we are getting this health warnings for my ceph cluster. I can't delete any pools.
Thanks in advance
Abhishek
Dear Team,
From today we are getting this health warnings for my ceph cluster. I can't delete any pools.
Thanks in advance
Abhishek
admin
2,930 Posts
Quote from admin on December 21, 2020, 8:59 amit means 1 pool has many objects but similar pg count than pools with lower object count.
you could suppress ths with setting
mon_pg_warn_max_object_skew to 0
put in in the Ceph Configuration ui under global section
the other option is to re-adjust the pg count but this will cause a lot of rebalance traffic and not recommended.
it means 1 pool has many objects but similar pg count than pools with lower object count.
you could suppress ths with setting
mon_pg_warn_max_object_skew to 0
put in in the Ceph Configuration ui under global section
the other option is to re-adjust the pg count but this will cause a lot of rebalance traffic and not recommended.
Abhishek Kumar Singh
18 Posts
Quote from Abhishek Kumar Singh on December 24, 2020, 10:17 amHi Team,
We have 3 node working cluster. we are thinking to add one more server but we are stuck at node interfaces.
Current Cluster network setting,
bond0: eth0(1G),eth1(1G)[Management]
bond1: eth5(10G),eth6(10G)[Backend]
bond2: eth2(10G),eth7(10G) [iSCSI].
But In our new server eth2 is 1G port. How can we rectify this issue.
Hope you understand my query.
Thanks in advance,
Abhishek
Hi Team,
We have 3 node working cluster. we are thinking to add one more server but we are stuck at node interfaces.
Current Cluster network setting,
bond0: eth0(1G),eth1(1G)[Management]
bond1: eth5(10G),eth6(10G)[Backend]
bond2: eth2(10G),eth7(10G) [iSCSI].
But In our new server eth2 is 1G port. How can we rectify this issue.
Hope you understand my query.
Thanks in advance,
Abhishek
admin
2,930 Posts
Quote from admin on December 24, 2020, 12:13 pmYou can rename or re-order interface names from the blue screen menu on the node itself.
You can rename or re-order interface names from the blue screen menu on the node itself.